Récupération d'articles d'archives

content/interets/liens-interessants/2024/02/22/ad911ebf/index.md

@@ -1,26 +1,26 @@
 ---
-links:
-  - name: Page d'origine
-    url: https://tonsky.me/blog/js-bloat/
-    lang: en
-title: JavaScript Bloat in 2024 @ tonsky.me
-date: "2024-02-22 12:00:00"
-keywords: []
+comments_url: https://com.richard-dern.fr/post/178
 cover: images/screenshot.png
+date: '2024-02-22 12:00:00'
+keywords: []
+links:
+- lang: en
+  name: Page d'origine
+  url: https://tonsky.me/blog/js-bloat/
 status:
-  - date: '2025-03-25T10:55:19.654Z'
-    http_code: 200
+- date: '2025-03-25T10:55:19.654Z'
+  http_code: 200
+title: JavaScript Bloat in 2024 @ tonsky.me
 weather:
-  temperature: 9.2
   humidity: 88
-  pressure: 997.3
   illuminance: 11149.6
   precipitations: true
-  wind_speed: 38.5
-  wind_direction: 222
+  pressure: 997.3
   source:
-    - open-meteo
-comments_url: https://com.richard-dern.fr/post/178
+  - open-meteo
+  temperature: 9.4
+  wind_direction: 222
+  wind_speed: 38.5
 ---
 
 > [...] I was living under impression that, for example, if the average web page size is 3 MB, then JavaScript bundle should be around 1 MB. Surely content should still take the majority, no?